sift.cards
Card profile with price guide values, recent sales, grading profile, and active eBay listings.

CAM WARD 2025 PANINI PRIZM ROOKIE PIGSKIN PRIZM #352 RC /180 PSA 10 Q4370 PSA 10 median sale
CAM WARD 2025 PANINI PRIZM ROOKIE PIGSKIN PRIZM #352 RC /180 PSA 10 Q4370 PSA 10 median sale

Panini 2025 Prizm Cam Ward Pig Skin Prizm Titans Rookie RC #352 65/180 NFL
The card matches the intended Cam Ward #352 Pigskin Prizm parallel and the listing shows both front and back, but the images are low-detail and shot through plastic with significant glare. I do not see an obvious major crease or severe corner damage, but centering looks only moderate and surface/edge condition cannot be reliably verified. As a raw PSA 10 candidate, this is possible but not strong from the provided photos; request sharper unsleeved or sleeve-only close-ups before paying a gem-premium price. More listing photos would improve confidence.
- Photos are soft/blurred and taken through a top loader, limiting inspection of surface, corners, and edges.
- Front centering appears noticeably off, with the left border looking wider than the right and possible top/bottom imbalance.
- Back centering also appears imperfect, with the card not squarely framed and right/left spacing difficult to judge but not clearly gem-centered.

Cam Ward Pigskin /180 Rookie RC 2025 Prizm #352
This is the intended Cam Ward Pigskin /180 Prizm rookie, but based on the listing photos it is not a strong PSA 10 candidate. Centering looks acceptable but not clearly gem, while the biggest concern is surface: the Prizm finish shows visible lines/specks/glare-obscured areas on the front and especially the back. Corners and edges look generally decent but not confidently flawless in the close-ups. Conservative assessment: more likely a nice raw card than a high-confidence PSA 10 submission candidate. More listing photos would improve confidence.
- Front centering appears slightly off, with the card looking a bit shifted left/right and possibly top/bottom not perfectly balanced.
- Multiple close-up photos show corners that are not clearly gem sharp; bottom corners in particular look somewhat vulnerable/soft under glare and angle.
- Chrome/Prizm surface shows numerous visible fine lines, print/surface marks, dust-like specks, and glare-obscured areas; difficult to separate sleeve/toploader artifacts from card defects, but enough visible risk to be conservative.